Menu

Javascript is not activated in your browser. This website needs javascript activated to work properly.
You are here

Predator recognition and defence strategies in crucian carp, Carassius carassius

Author:
  • Lars Pettersson
  • Anders Nilsson
  • Christer Brönmark
Publishing year: 2000
Language: English
Pages: 200-212
Publication/Series: Oikos
Volume: 88
Issue: 1
Document type: Journal article
Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell

Abstract english

Crucian carp from populations that lack piscivores are extremely vulnerable to predation. However, in the presence of piscivores these fish develop an inducible morphological defence, a deep body. This switch from a vulnerable, shallow-bodied morph to a morphologically defended morph makes this species very suitable for investigations of anti-predator strategies, and trade-offs between morphological and behavioural defences. To address these questions, we performed eight different experiments. We found that crucian carp exhibited fright responses to chemical cues from unfamiliar predators (northern pike, perch) when these were fed prey that contained alarm substance (for northern pike: crucian carp, roach; for perch: crucian carp). Cues from small pike that were fed prey that lacked alarm substance (swordtails) caused no significant fright response whereas cues from larger pike with the same diet did. Perch on a chironomid diet elicited weaker but significant fright responses. Starved predators caused as strong fright reactions as recently fed ones did, whereas no response was exhibited towards nonpredatory fish (roach, crucian carp). Crucian carp were able to detect the presence of pike after cues had been diluted to an equivalent of 21000 l, and larger predators elicited stronger fright responses. Prior experience of predators decreased fright responses. In particular, individuals from populations that coexisted with northern pike responded less to chemical cues from northern pike than individuals without prior experience did. Thus, crucian carp may use both alarm-substance related and predator-related cues to identify predators. Further, they were able to discriminate between large and small predators. Finally, individuals from populations that coexist with predators exhibit less pronounced fright responses. These fish have an induced morphological defence, a deep body, which most likely decreases the need for strong antipredator behaviour.

Keywords

  • Ecology

Other

Published
  • ISSN: 1600-0706
Lars B. Pettersson
E-mail: lars.pettersson [at] biol.lu.se

Researcher

Biodiversity

+46 46 222 38 18

+46 70 611 63 45

E-B371

50

Centre for Animal Movement Research
Evolutionary Ecology, Department of Biology
Ecology building S-223 62 Lund Sweden